posts - 4, comments - 8, trackbacks - 0
<< Developing Workflows using Visual Studio 2008 | Home | FormatPainter Word 2007 Ribbon Control >>

70-536 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Exam

Yesterday I passed the 70-536 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Exam. This is my first exam on my way to earning a MCPD: Enterprise Application Developer 3.5 certification.
My primary resource in studying for this exam was the MCTS Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-536) Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Book. I highly recommend this book; however, you’ll need to read the comments and corrections:
Here are some more great resources:
·         Tech Ed cram session
The 70-536 exam is now considered “version agnostic”, this exam is required for .NET Framework 2.0 and .NET Framework 3.5 certifications. This means I will be able to move directly into the .NET Framework 3.5 certification exams!
While I’m glad to have passed this exam, I’m even more excited to get started studying for my next exam:  70-562 .NET Framework 3.5 ASP.NET Application Development.

Print | posted on Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:41 AM |

Feedback

Gravatar

# re: 70-536 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Exam

Congratulations, Mike!
6/19/2008 11:40 AM | Paul Robichaux
Gravatar

# re: 70-536 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Exam

Congrats Mike !
6/26/2008 4:24 PM | Mathew
Gravatar

# re: 70-536 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Application Development Foundation Exam

Hi Mike,

Congarats!

I have a question. I want to give the exam 70-562 but I thisnk the self paced training kit for that exam is not yet released. What book are you referrring to for 70-562?

The preparation guide lists this book: Programming with Microsoft ASP.Net 3.5 but I dont think that book is written exam point of view.

One more question, When you try to register for the exam on Prometric.com it doesn't even give the option for 70-562. So is it available or not?
Have you done any research on this?

Thanks,
Nancy
8/1/2008 12:48 PM | Nancy

Post Comment

Title  
Name  
Email
Url
Comment   
Please add 7 and 7 and type the answer here:

Powered by:

Copyright © Mike Rand